BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19862405)

  • 1. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N; Karabulut E
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Nov; 27(6):755-64. PubMed ID: 19241682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites.
    Gedik R; Hürmüzlü F; Coşkun A; Bektaş OO; Ozdemir AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 16161365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different polishing systems and drinks on the color stability of resin composite.
    Berber A; Cakir FY; Baseren M; Gurgan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 24309346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Ozgünaltay G; Yazici AR; Görücü J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 12535151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
    Lu H; Roeder LB; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(5):297-303; discussion 304. PubMed ID: 14620660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
    Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.