These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19862405)

  • 21. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
    Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
    Scheibe KG; Almeida KG; Medeiros IS; Costa JF; Alves CM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19148401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer.
    Pedrini D; Candido MS; Rodrigues AL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):714-9. PubMed ID: 12791157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Salivary, acidic and enzymatic degradation of resin composite subjected to different finishing and polishing systems.
    Berri LM; Keese EVM; França FMG; Basting RT; Vieira Junior WF; Turssi CP
    Am J Dent; 2024 Apr; 37(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 38704848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
    Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gloss and surface roughness produced by polishing kits on resin composites.
    Sadidzadeh R; Cakir D; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 2010 Aug; 23(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.
    Turssi CP; Saad JR; Duarte SL; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun; 13(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 11763949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing.
    Joniot S; Salomon JP; Dejou J; Grégoire G
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16536192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.