151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19864243)
21. Interlaboratory concordance of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining interpretation in HPV-positive women in a screening population.
Benevolo M; Mancuso P; Allia E; Gustinucci D; Bulletti S; Cesarini E; Carozzi FM; Confortini M; Bisanzi S; Carlinfante G; Rubino T; Rollo F; Marchi N; Farruggio A; Pusiol T; Venturelli F; Giorgi Rossi P;
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 May; 128(5):323-332. PubMed ID: 32168431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis.
Sağlam A; Usubütün A; Dolgun A; Mutter GL; Salman MC; Kurtulan O; Akyol A; Özkan EA; Baykara S; Bülbül D; Calay Z; Eren F; Gümürdülü D; Haberal N; Ilvan Ş; Karaveli Ş; Koyuncuoğlu M; Müezzinoğlu B; Müftüoğlu KH; Özen Ö; Özdemir N; Peştereli E; Ulukuş Ç; Zekioğlu O
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2017; 1(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 28832077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical dysplasia among pathologists from 4 continents.
Ceballos KM; Chapman W; Daya D; Julian JA; Lytwyn A; McLachlin CM; Elit L
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18156983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Interpretive Variability of Cervical Biopsies and Its Relationship to HPV Status.
Stoler MH; Ronnett BM; Joste NE; Hunt WC; Cuzick J; Wheeler CM;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Jun; 39(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 25602796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immunostaining for p16INK4a used as a conjunctive tool improves interobserver agreement of the histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Horn LC; Reichert A; Oster A; Arndal SF; Trunk MJ; Ridder R; Rassmussen OF; Bjelkenkrantz K; Christiansen P; Eck M; Lorey T; Skovlund VR; Ruediger T; Schneider V; Schmidt D
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Apr; 32(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 18223479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of duplicate slides on atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion.
Zhang S; Kelly B; Hospodar E; Thibodeaux J; Thomas J; Abreo F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jan; 40(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. P16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves the reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cone biopsies.
Gurrola-Díaz CM; Suárez-Rincón AE; Vázquez-Camacho G; Buonocunto-Vázquez G; Rosales-Quintana S; Wentzensen N; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18692882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues.
Malpica A; Matisic JP; Niekirk DV; Crum CP; Staerkel GA; Yamal JM; Guillaud MH; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin NM; Macaulay CA; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S38-52. PubMed ID: 16183106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-observer variation in cytological and histological diagnoses of cervical neoplasia and its epidemiologic implication.
Kato I; Santamaria M; De Ruiz PA; Aristizabal N; Bosch FX; De Sanjosé S; Muñoz N
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):1167-74. PubMed ID: 7636519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Vale DB; Westin MC; Zeferino LC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Oct; 121(10):576-81. PubMed ID: 23765869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades II/III and cervical cancer in patients with cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells when high-grade intraepithelial lesions (ASC-H) cannot be ruled out.
Cytryn A; Russomano FB; Camargo MJ; Zardo LM; Horta NM; Fonseca Rde C; Tristão MA; Monteiro AC
Sao Paulo Med J; 2009 Sep; 127(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20169277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical biopsy specimens obtained from women screened by visual inspection with acetic acid and hybrid capture 2.
Basu P; Kamal M; Ray C; Bhat D; Ghosh I; Mittal S; Chatterjee S; Samaddar A; Biswas J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Sep; 32(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 23896715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance report: a national survey.
Confortini M; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Ghiringhello B; Parisio F; Prandi S; Ronco G; Ciatto S; Montanari G;
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 14510890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study.
Insinga RP; Glass AG; Rush BB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15295350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Investigating Diagnostic Problems of CIN1 and CIN2 Associated With High-risk HPV by Combining the Novel Molecular Biomarker PanHPVE4 With P16INK4a.
van Baars R; Griffin H; Wu Z; Soneji YJ; van de Sandt M; Arora R; van der Marel J; Ter Harmsel B; Jach R; Okon K; Huras H; Jenkins D; Quint W; Doorbar J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Nov; 39(11):1518-1528. PubMed ID: 26379150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low-resolution images: a feasibility study.
Eichhorn JH; Brauns TA; Gelfand JA; Crothers BA; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 105(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15937917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Caughley LM; Date A; Hamilton PW; Thornton CM; Walsh MY
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 49(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 8943751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The risk of false-positive histology according to the reason for colposcopy referral in cervical cancer screening: a blind revision of all histologic lesions found in the NTCC trial.
Dalla Palma P; Giorgi Rossi P; Collina G; Buccoliero AM; Ghiringhello B; Lestani M; Onnis G; Aldovini D; Galanti G; Casadei G; Aldi M; Gomes V; Giubilato P; Ronco G;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 18089491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Fluid-based thin-layer method for screening of squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnant women].
Wu X; Huang XH; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 41(10):689-92. PubMed ID: 17199925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
