164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19865054)
1. Intraocular pressure measurements with the newly reconfigured Ocuton S*TT-MV self-tonometer in comparison to Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.
Lanfermann E; Jürgens C; Grossjohann R; Antal S; Tost F
Med Sci Monit; 2009 Nov; 15(11):CR556-62. PubMed ID: 19865054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-tonometry with the Ocuton S: evaluation of accuracy in glaucoma patients.
Sacu S; Vass C; Schemper M; Rainer G
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 15291933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers.
Jain AK; Saini JS; Gupta R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 48(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11271930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of the IOPen® in a glaucomatous population.
Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queirós A; Ribeiro P; Ferreira A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Nov; 30(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 21205273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the new Ocuton S tonometer.
Marchini G; Babighian S; Specchia L; Perfetti S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Apr; 80(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 11952483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study.
Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Jun; 79(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 11401642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Lindén C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
