BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19865617)

  • 1. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces.
    Bernardes SR; de Araujo CA; Neto AJ; Simamoto Junior P; das Neves FD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):781-9. PubMed ID: 19865617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
    Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
    Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
    Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
    da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants.
    Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Santiago JF; de Moraes SL; de Carvalho BM
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 20545530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions.
    Karl M; Kelly JR
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1426-32. PubMed ID: 19643468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.