117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1986959)
1. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by tubule intussusception: a new technique in rat model.
Stefanovic KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ
Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 1986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by loop intussusception. A new technique in the rat model.
Stefanović KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ
Br J Urol; 1991 Nov; 68(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 1747729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Problems unique to microsurgical epididymovasostomy. Comparison of four techniques in a laboratory rat model with review of the literature.
Stefanović KB; Buncke HJ; Clark SA
Int Urol Nephrol; 1993; 25(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8365850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
Chan PT; Li PS; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1924-9. PubMed ID: 12686875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new one-layer epididymovasostomy technique.
Hussein A
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):653-8. PubMed ID: 24924910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Ideal experimental microsurgical methods in vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy].
Drawz B; Drawz G; Putzke HP; Baasner R
Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1987; 20(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3617849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experience with microsurgical epididymovasostomy (specific tubule technic: end-to-end anastomosis by the Silber method)].
Nishimura K; Matsuda M; Nonomura M; Takeuchi H; Okada K; Yoshida O
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1986 Jul; 32(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 3776762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pull-through technique for the advancement of the unfolded epididymal tubule and the tubulo-deferential telescopic reconstruction.
Tritto G
Ann Urol (Paris); 1989; 23(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 2589829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epididymo-deferens anastomosis. Experimental study in the rat].
Hacker P; Roth A; Nezelof C; Cukier J
J Urol (Paris); 1983; 89(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 6875300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional evaluation of new experimental model of microsurgical tubulovasostomy in rat.
Tritto G; Mitolo-Chieppa D; Piccinno A; Di Giovanni V; Carratú MR
Urology; 1985 Feb; 25(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 3969755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique.
Shekarriz M; Pomer S
Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsurgically splinted tubulovasostomy in the rat: modified technique.
Papadopoulos I; Kelâmi A
Urol Int; 1985; 40(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 3887713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule.
Silber SJ
Fertil Steril; 1978 Nov; 30(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 720645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tubulovasostomy in the rat. A new experimental model.
Belgrano E; Carmignani G; Puppo P; Gaboardi F; Trombetta C
J Androl; 1983; 4(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 6618995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
Shekarriz B; Pomer S
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):294. PubMed ID: 12478173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of obstructive interval on patency rates following microsurgical epididymovasostomy.
Schoor RA; Elhanbly SM; Ross LS; Niederberger CS
World J Urol; 2002 Apr; 19(6):453-6. PubMed ID: 12022714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Results following microsurgical epididymovasotomy].
Zepnick H; Matz M; Adler D
Z Urol Nephrol; 1985 Feb; 78(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 3887802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
Kumar R
J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):810-1. PubMed ID: 14713830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Possible preservation of the insemination capacity after testis-deferens anastomosis. Studies in the rat].
Pelagalli GV
Acta Med Vet (Napoli); 1968; 14(6):421-35. PubMed ID: 5735346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
