These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1987481)

  • 1. A cleanish bill of health.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Jan; 349(6307):272. PubMed ID: 1987481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recertification and peer review in the United States.
    Rose JC
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1974 Sep; 24(146):595-7. PubMed ID: 4478844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRC and peer review.
    Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6292):418. PubMed ID: 2215657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRC and research funding.
    Pegg DE
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8827):1102. PubMed ID: 1357493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research and ophthalmology in the UK.
    Lancet; 1990 Jun; 335(8703):1434-5. PubMed ID: 1972214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caffeine, health and commercial interests.
    Golding J
    Addiction; 1995 Jul; 90(7):988-90. PubMed ID: 7663323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peering into the bowels of the MRC. II: Review systems.
    Smith R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6621):556-60. PubMed ID: 3126904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health reform: ... as UK faces the bill.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6468):173-4. PubMed ID: 8145806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembering the peer in peer review.
    O'Connell KA
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review of health services research grant applications.
    McFall D
    Inquiry; 1978 Sep; 15(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 151070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appraisal and peer review.
    Reilly T
    J Sports Sci; 1992 Oct; 10(5):399. PubMed ID: 1433459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moron peer review.
    Brenner S
    Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review reviewed.
    Mehl JW
    Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review in health services research: issues and problems.
    Eichhorn RL; Maurana CA
    Health Serv Res; 1981; 16(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 7298338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research funding and the peer review system.
    Apirion D
    Fed Proc; 1979 Dec; 38(13):2649-50. PubMed ID: 510555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A different peer review.
    Page IH
    JAMA; 1973 Sep; 225(10):1240-1. PubMed ID: 4740988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
    Bucy PC
    Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.