These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19875052)

  • 1. Use of pressure-hold test for sterilizing filter membrane integrity in radiopharmaceutical manufacturing.
    Belanger AP; Byrne JF; Paolino JM; DeGrado TR
    Nucl Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 36(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 19875052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the bubble point test of a 0.22-μm membrane filter used for the sterilizing filtration of PET radiopharmaceuticals.
    Hayashi K; Douhara K; Kashino G
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 28(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 24610680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basics of sterile compounding: bubble point testing.
    Thoma L
    Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 24881342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Water Pressure Integrity Test--a new integrity test for hydrophobic membrane filters.
    Dosmar M; Wolber P; Bracht K; Tröger H; Waibel P
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1992; 46(4):102-6. PubMed ID: 1453277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of an automated filter integrity tester for use in bubble point testing.
    Sechovec KS
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2926603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pressure hold/drop integrity test; its correlation to diffusive flow.
    Trotter AM; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(4):182-5. PubMed ID: 9752714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preuse/Poststerilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT): To Do or Not to Do?
    Gupta VS; Jindal J; Gupta A; Gupta NK
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 31732690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data Mining to Determine the Influence of Fluid Properties on the Integrity Test Values.
    Thome B; Joseph B; Dassu D; Gaerke J; McBurnie L; Dixit M; Stering M; Tomlinson S; Mills S; Ferrante S; Weitzmann C
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(5):524-562. PubMed ID: 32467178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Air-Water Binary Gas Integrity Test for Sterilizing and Virus Filters.
    Giglia S; Caulmare J; Nhiem D; Porreca D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2016 11/12; 70(6):577-590. PubMed ID: 27789800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scale-up of Sterilizing-grade Membrane Filters from Discs to Pleated Cartridges: Effects of Operating Parameters and Solution Properties.
    Kumar A; Martin J; Kuriyel R
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 25691716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of tubing material on the failure of product-specific bubble points of sterilizing-grade filters.
    Meyer BK; Vargas D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 17089693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insufficiency of single point diffusive air flow integrity testing.
    Meltzer TH
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1992; 46(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 1625104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A semi-automated system for concentration of rhenium-188 for radiopharmaceutical applications.
    Wunderlich G; Hartmann H; Andreeff M; Kotzerke J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1876-80. PubMed ID: 18524608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of automated instruments used in the pharmaceutical industry for integrity testing sterilizing filters.
    Czermak P; Catapano G
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2003; 57(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 14558701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microfluidic technology for PET radiochemistry.
    Gillies JM; Prenant C; Chimon GN; Smethurst GJ; Dekker BA; Zweit J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Mar; 64(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 16290947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of the resolution in direct membrane integrity test by controlling solution surface tension.
    Lee JH; Hong SK; Hur HC; Choi YJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2205-11. PubMed ID: 19494460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A method for checking the integrity and quality of membrane filters for sterilizing nutrient culture media].
    Allakhverdiev AM
    Med Parazitol (Mosk); 1989; (6):67-8. PubMed ID: 2628715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A validatible porosimetric technique for verifying the integrity of virus-retentive membranes.
    Phillips MW; DiLeo AJ
    Biologicals; 1996 Sep; 24(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 8978924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Filter quality of pleated filter cartridges.
    Chen CW; Huang SH; Chiang CM; Hsiao TC; Chen CC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 18326869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.