These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19875143)

  • 1. Microfoam formation in a capillary.
    Kotopoulis S; Postema M
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 19875143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic Traveling Waves for Near-Wall Positioning of Single Microbubbles in a Flowing Channel.
    Kim YC; Vijayaratnam PRS; Blanloeuil P; Taylor RA; Barber TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 36669943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of microbubble response to long pulses used in ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery.
    Mannaris C; Averkiou MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 22341047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model.
    Cho E; Chung SK; Rhee K
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():66-74. PubMed ID: 26025507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2014 May; 14(10):1705-14. PubMed ID: 24651248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
    Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficiency and stability of bubble formation by acoustic vaporization of submicron perfluorocarbon droplets.
    Reznik N; Shpak O; Gelderblom EC; Williams R; de Jong N; Versluis M; Burns PN
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Sep; 53(7):1368-76. PubMed ID: 23652262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles.
    Calliada F; Campani R; Bottinelli O; Bozzini A; Sommaruga MG
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S157-60. PubMed ID: 9652516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-assisted microbubbles gene transfer in tendons for gene therapy.
    Delalande A; Bureau MF; Midoux P; Bouakaz A; Pichon C
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 19857885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.
    Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles.
    Sboros V; Pye SD; Macdonald CA; Gomatam J; Moran CM; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1063-72. PubMed ID: 16085097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unbinding of targeted ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by secondary acoustic forces.
    Garbin V; Overvelde M; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6161-77. PubMed ID: 21878709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
    Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic sizing of an ultrasound contrast agent.
    Maresca D; Emmer M; van Neer PL; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Muller M; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1713-21. PubMed ID: 20850027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic Behavior of Microbubbles during Long Ultrasound Tone-Burst Excitation: Mechanistic Insights into Ultrasound-Microbubble Mediated Therapeutics Using High-Speed Imaging and Cavitation Detection.
    Chen X; Wang J; Pacella JJ; Villanueva FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):528-538. PubMed ID: 26603628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of coupling, bubble size, and spatial arrangement on chaotic dynamics of microbubble cluster in ultrasonic fields.
    Dzaharudin F; Suslov SA; Manasseh R; Ooi A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3425-34. PubMed ID: 24180753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating.
    Phillips LC; Puett C; Sheeran PS; Wilson Miller G; Matsunaga TO; Dayton PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1473-82. PubMed ID: 23927187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observing ultrasound stimulated microbubble dynamics at MHz framing rates.
    Prentice PA; Campbell PA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4463-6. PubMed ID: 19163705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.