227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19875317)
1. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a randomized controlled trial comparing skeletal stability.
Ow A; Cheung LK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19875317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?
Ow AT; Cheung LK
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review.
Ow A; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications.
Ow A; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 39(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 20452186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions.
Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: short- and long-term stability.
Frey DR; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 17428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of sagittal split advancement osteotomy: single- versus double-jaw surgery.
Ayoub AF; Stirrups DR; Moos KF
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 9082006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial.
Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 25595452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature.
Schreuder WH; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies.
Emshoff R; Scheiderbauer A; Gerhard S; Norer B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 32(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 12729772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial.
Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 25457820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of vertical body osteotomy and sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular corpus distraction.
Sahoo NK; Rangarajan H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 21111521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.
Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1219-27; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 11078132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
