These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19875853)

  • 1. A statistical change point model approach for the detection of DNA copy number variations in array CGH data.
    Chen J; Wang YP
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 19875853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of ultra-dense array CGH analysis for the discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome.
    Przybytkowski E; Ferrario C; Basik M
    BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Jan; 4():16. PubMed ID: 21272361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-cell copy number variation detection.
    Cheng J; Vanneste E; Konings P; Voet T; Vermeesch JR; Moreau Y
    Genome Biol; 2011 Aug; 12(8):R80. PubMed ID: 21854607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High frequency of common DNA copy number abnormalities detected by bacterial artificial chromosome array comparative genomic hybridization in 24 breast cancer cell lines.
    Saito S; Morita K; Hirano T
    Hum Cell; 2009 Feb; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19222606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Break-Points Detection in Array CGH Data via the Cross-Entropy Method.
    Priyadarshana WJ; Sofronov G
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 26357234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of tumor heterogeneity using CGH array data.
    Wang K; Li J; Li S; Bolund L; Wiuf C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():12. PubMed ID: 19134174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
    Lassmann S; Weis R; Makowiec F; Roth J; Danciu M; Hopt U; Werner M
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Mar; 85(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 17143621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visualization-based discovery and analysis of genomic aberrations in microarray data.
    Myers CL; Chen X; Troyanskaya OG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():146. PubMed ID: 15953389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ready to clone: CNV detection and breakpoint fine-mapping in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes by high-resolution array CGH.
    Hackmann K; Kuhlee F; Betcheva-Krajcir E; Kahlert AK; Mackenroth L; Klink B; Di Donato N; Tzschach A; Kast K; Wimberger P; Schrock E; Rump A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):585-90. PubMed ID: 27581129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-scale genomic DNA copy number aberrations as another means of mutagenesis in breast cancer.
    Chao HH; He X; Parker JS; Zhao W; Perou CM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51719. PubMed ID: 23284754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis.
    Lai TL; Xing H; Zhang N
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):290-307. PubMed ID: 17855472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
    Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.
    Pollack JR; Perou CM; Alizadeh AA; Eisen MB; Pergamenschikov A; Williams CF; Jeffrey SS; Botstein D; Brown PO
    Nat Genet; 1999 Sep; 23(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10471496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.
    Willenbrock H; Fridlyand J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4084-91. PubMed ID: 16159913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting copy number variations from array CGH data based on a conditional random field model.
    Yin XL; Li J
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 20401947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.
    Hsu L; Self SG; Grove D; Randolph T; Wang K; Delrow JJ; Loo L; Porter P
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 15772101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.