These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19876405)

  • 1. Unforgettable ultimatums? Expectation violations promote enhanced social memory following economic bargaining.
    Chang LJ; Sanfey AG
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2009; 3():36. PubMed ID: 19876405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expect the Worst! Expectations and Social Interactive Decision Making.
    Giorgetta C; Grecucci A; Graffeo M; Bonini N; Ferrario R; Sanfey AG
    Brain Sci; 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33946847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social economic decision-making across the lifespan: An fMRI investigation.
    Harlé KM; Sanfey AG
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1416-24. PubMed ID: 22414593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of decision making after unfair treatment.
    Wu Y; Zang Y; Yuan B; Tian X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():123. PubMed ID: 25798102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain substrates of social decision-making in dual diagnosis: cocaine dependence and personality disorders.
    Verdejo-Garcia A; Verdejo-Román J; Albein-Urios N; Martínez-González JM; Soriano-Mas C
    Addict Biol; 2017 Mar; 22(2):457-467. PubMed ID: 26442666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural representations of social valence bias economic interpersonal choices.
    Díaz-Gutiérrez P; Arco JE; Alguacil S; González-García C; Ruz M
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Oct; 147():107584. PubMed ID: 32783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.
    Güroğlu B; van den Bos W; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 5(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 20350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying norm-enforcement behaviors under social observation.
    Ouyang H; Sun F; Che L; Zhang W; Cheng X; Zheng L
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 May; 238(5):1311-1321. PubMed ID: 32318750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced Memory for Fair-Related Faces and the Role of Trait Anxiety.
    Park G; Marsh BU; Johnson EJ
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():760. PubMed ID: 31057449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game.
    Takagishi H; Takahashi T; Toyomura A; Takashino N; Koizumi M; Yamagishi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 20010492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remembering the bad ones: Does the source memory advantage for cheaters influence our later actions positively?
    Kroneisen M; Bott FM; Mayer M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Oct; 74(10):1669-1685. PubMed ID: 33765882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.