These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19876405)

  • 41. Less Expectation, Less Pain: Low Wealth Alleviates Sense of Unfairness.
    Pei G; Jin J; Li T; Fang C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():571952. PubMed ID: 33995167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neural substrates underlying the tendency to accept anger-infused ultimatum offers during dynamic social interactions.
    Gilam G; Lin T; Raz G; Azrielant S; Fruchter E; Ariely D; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():400-11. PubMed ID: 26166623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Social decision-making in the brain: Input-state-output modelling reveals patterns of effective connectivity underlying reciprocal choices.
    Shaw D; Czekóová K; Gajdoš M; Staněk R; Špalek J; Brázdil M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Feb; 40(2):699-712. PubMed ID: 30431199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fairness overrides group bias in children's second-party punishment.
    McAuliffe K; Dunham Y
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):485-494. PubMed ID: 28383989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Me first: Neural representations of fairness during three-party interactions.
    Yoder KJ; Decety J
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Oct; 147():107576. PubMed ID: 32758554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reputation in an economic game modulates premotor cortex activity during action observation.
    Farmer H; Apps M; Tsakiris M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2191-201. PubMed ID: 27364606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Altered neural responses to social fairness in bipolar disorder.
    Lois G; Schneider EE; Kaurin A; Wessa M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102487. PubMed ID: 33395978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Better to give than to take? Interactive social decision-making in severe major depressive disorder.
    Destoop M; Schrijvers D; De Grave C; Sabbe B; De Bruijn ER
    J Affect Disord; 2012 Mar; 137(1-3):98-105. PubMed ID: 22240086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Testosterone Administration Related Differences in Brain Activation during the Ultimatum Game.
    Kopsida E; Berrebi J; Petrovic P; Ingvar M
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():66. PubMed ID: 26973448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder.
    King-Casas B; Sharp C; Lomax-Bream L; Lohrenz T; Fonagy P; Montague PR
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):806-10. PubMed ID: 18687957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interactive decision-making in people with schizotypal traits: a game theory approach.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jan; 185(1-2):92-6. PubMed ID: 20538347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cognitive Load Does Not Affect the Behavioral and Cognitive Foundations of Social Cooperation.
    Mieth L; Bell R; Buchner A
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1312. PubMed ID: 27630597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fair play: social norm compliance failures in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.
    O'Callaghan C; Bertoux M; Irish M; Shine JM; Wong S; Spiliopoulos L; Hodges JR; Hornberger M
    Brain; 2016 Jan; 139(Pt 1):204-16. PubMed ID: 26503957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mental attributes and temporal brain dynamics during bargaining: EEG source localization and neuroinformatic mapping.
    Güçlü B; Ertaç S; Hortaçsu A; List JA
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(2):159-77. PubMed ID: 21919562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.