These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Qualifications and legal responsibility of the operating room nurse]. Haslinger A Osterr Krankenpflegez; 1983; 36(4):113-6. PubMed ID: 6190120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Documentation: professional goals and legal outcomes. November R Todays OR Nurse; 1988 Nov; 10(11):8-11. PubMed ID: 2462291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing your legal risks in the perioperative setting. Duffy W Todays Surg Nurse; 1999; 21(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10232278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some important medical law cases of interest to theatre nurses. Tingle JH NATNEWS; 1990 Sep; 27(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 2234039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. TX: surgical nurses and 'wrong site surgery': was this RN 'cause' of wrong site surgery? Vestalv. Wright, 2-08-237-CV (8/31/2009)-TX. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Sep; 50(4):3. PubMed ID: 19877409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 6 1/2 inch scissor clamp left in patient. Case in point: Fox v. Oklahoma Memorial Hosp. (774 P. 2d 459--OK (1989)). Tammalleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Sep; 30(4):4. PubMed ID: 2594978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The nurse and the law: drama in the theatre - Pt. II. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1981 Sep; 11(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 6915753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sponge left in pt.: did required surgery delay treatment & cause death? Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jun; 45(1):1. PubMed ID: 15298323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Malpractice and the National Practitioner Data Bank: what OR nurses need to know. Goodman RS Todays OR Nurse; 1991 Aug; 13(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 1877076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal accountability in the operating room. Furay CJ Todays OR Nurse; 1989 Jun; 11(6):22-3, 26-8. PubMed ID: 2734816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Captain of ship doctrine: vicarious liability. Case in point: Krane v. Saint Anthony Hosp. Systems (738 P. 2d 75-CO). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Aug; 28(3):4. PubMed ID: 2442796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]