403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19878150)
1. Colonoscopy-controlled intra-individual comparisons to screen relevant neoplasia: faecal immunochemical test vs. guaiac-based faecal occult blood test.
Oort FA; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Van Der Hulst RW; Van Heukelem HA; Loffeld RJ; Wesdorp IC; Van Wanrooij RL; De Baaij L; Mutsaers ER; van der Reijt S; Coupe VM; Berkhof J; Bouman AA; Meijer GA; Mulder CJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Feb; 31(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 19878150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of a new bedside faecal occult blood test in a prospective multicentre study.
Hoepffner N; Shastri YM; Hanisch E; Rösch W; Mössner J; Caspary WF; Stein J
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Jan; 23(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 16393292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test is more efficient for detecting significant colorectal neoplasia than a sensitive guaiac test.
Levi Z; Hazazi R; Rozen P; Vilkin A; Waked A; Niv Y
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 May; 23(9):1359-64. PubMed ID: 16629942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.
van Rossum LG; van Rijn AF; Laheij RJ; van Oijen MG; Fockens P; van Krieken HH; Verbeek AL; Jansen JB; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jul; 135(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 18482589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative colonoscopic evaluation of relative efficiencies of an immunochemical faecal occult blood test and a sensitive guaiac test for detecting significant colorectal neoplasms.
Rozen P; Levi Z; Hazazi R; Waked A; Vilkin A; Maoz E; Birkenfeld S; Niv Y
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Feb; 29(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 19035980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower risk of advanced neoplasia among patients with a previous negative result from a fecal test for colorectal cancer.
Denters MJ; Deutekom M; Bossuyt PM; Stroobants AK; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2012 Mar; 142(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 22108194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; de Jonge V; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; Looman CW; van Vuuren AJ; Reijerink JC; Habbema JD; Essink-Bot ML; Kuipers EJ
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jul; 46(11):2059-66. PubMed ID: 20621736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between a guaiac and three immunochemical faecal occult blood tests in screening for colorectal cancer.
Faivre J; Dancourt V; Denis B; Dorval E; Piette C; Perrin P; Bidan JM; Jard C; Jung S; Levillain R; Viguier J; Bretagne JF
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 48(16):2969-76. PubMed ID: 22572481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.
Brenner H; Tao S
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 49(14):3049-54. PubMed ID: 23706981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population.
Guittet L; Bouvier V; Mariotte N; Vallee JP; Arsène D; Boutreux S; Tichet J; Launoy G
Gut; 2007 Feb; 56(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 16891354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.
Allison JE; Sakoda LC; Levin TR; Tucker JP; Tekawa IS; Cuff T; Pauly MP; Shlager L; Palitz AM; Zhao WK; Schwartz JS; Ransohoff DF; Selby JV
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1462-70. PubMed ID: 17895475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening.
Park DI; Ryu S; Kim YH; Lee SH; Lee CK; Eun CS; Han DS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Sep; 105(9):2017-25. PubMed ID: 20502450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The positive predictive value of guaiac faecal occult blood test in relation to the number of positive squares in two consecutive rounds of colorectal cancer screening.
Manfredi S; Philip J; Campillo B; Piette C; Durand G; Riou F; Bretagne JF
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jul; 20(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 21633201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The immunochemical faecal occult blood test leads to higher compliance than the guaiac for colorectal cancer screening programmes: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Federici A; Giorgi Rossi P; Borgia P; Bartolozzi F; Farchi S; Gausticchi G
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15949119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance improvements of stool-based screening tests.
van Dam L; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):479-92. PubMed ID: 20833351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex differences in performance of fecal occult blood testing.
Brenner H; Haug U; Hundt S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Nov; 105(11):2457-64. PubMed ID: 20700114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests are superior to guaiac-based tests for the detection of colorectal neoplasms.
Dancourt V; Lejeune C; Lepage C; Gailliard MC; Meny B; Faivre J
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Oct; 44(15):2254-8. PubMed ID: 18760592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which colorectal cancer screening test is best?
Mandel JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1424-5. PubMed ID: 17895471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Earlier stages of colorectal cancer detected with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests.
van Rossum LG; van Rijn AF; van Munster IP; Jansen JB; Fockens P; Laheij RJ; Dekker E
Neth J Med; 2009 May; 67(5):182-6. PubMed ID: 19581668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
