BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19878242)

  • 1. Semipermeable glove membranes--effects on skin barrier repair following SLS irritation.
    Bock M; Damer K; Wulfhorst B; John SM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Nov; 61(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 19878242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anti-inflammatory effect of pimecrolimus in the sodium lauryl sulphate test.
    Engel K; Reuter J; Seiler C; Schulte Mönting J; Jakob T; Schempp CM
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Apr; 22(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 18031501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans.
    Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Air flow at different temperatures increases sodium lauryl sulphate-induced barrier disruption and irritation in vivo.
    Fluhr JW; Praessler J; Akengin A; Fuchs SM; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jun; 152(6):1228-34. PubMed ID: 15948986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo.
    Fluhr JW; Akengin A; Bornkessel A; Fuchs S; Praessler J; Norgauer J; Grieshaber R; Kleesz P; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 153(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 16029337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
    Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
    Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tandem repeated irritation in aged skin induces distinct barrier perturbation and cytokine profile in vivo.
    Angelova-Fischer I; Becker V; Fischer TW; Zillikens D; Wigger-Alberti W; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 22578221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential irritant skin responses to topical retinoic acid and sodium lauryl sulphate: alone and in crossover design.
    Effendy I; Weltfriend S; Patil S; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Mar; 134(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 8731664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of impermeable and semipermeable glove materials on resolution of inflammation and epidermal barrier impairment after experimental skin irritation.
    Heichel T; Brans R; John SM; Nienhaus A; Nordheider K; Wilke A; Sonsmann FK
    Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Jul; 89(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 37015218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study.
    Branco N; Lee I; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):278-84. PubMed ID: 16283906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratum corneum cytokines and skin irritation response to sodium lauryl sulfate.
    De Jongh CM; Verberk MM; Withagen CE; Jacobs JJ; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):325-33. PubMed ID: 16787454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation.
    Slotosch CM; Kampf G; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 17868216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of glove occlusion on cumulative skin irritation with or without hand cleanser-comparison in an experimental repeated irritation model.
    Antonov D; Kleesz P; Elsner P; Schliemann S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 23343466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection.
    Pedersen LK; Held E; Johansen JD; Agner T
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Dec; 153(6):1142-6. PubMed ID: 16307649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence of increased skin irritation after wet work: impact of water exposure and occlusion.
    Fartasch M; Taeger D; Broding HC; Schöneweis S; Gellert B; Pohrt U; Brüning T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Oct; 67(4):217-28. PubMed ID: 22591550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of glycerol on human skin damaged by acute sodium lauryl sulphate treatment.
    Atrux-Tallau N; Romagny C; Padois K; Denis A; Haftek M; Falson F; Pirot F; Maibach HI
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2010 Aug; 302(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 20043170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
    Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.