BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19878827)

  • 1. Torsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataract.
    Wang Y; Xia Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Chen B; Liu Y; Liu Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1941-5. PubMed ID: 19878827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
    Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
    Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.
    Pereira AC; Porfírio F; Freitas LL; Belfort R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1661-6. PubMed ID: 17010864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification.
    Baradaran-Rafii A; Rahmati-Kamel M; Eslani M; Kiavash V; Karimian F
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):732-7. PubMed ID: 19304097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phacopower modulation and the risk for postoperative corneal decompensation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Doors M; Berendschot TT; Touwslager W; Webers CA; Nuijts RM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 131(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 24030086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
    Zeng M; Liu X; Liu Y; Xia Y; Luo L; Yuan Z; Zeng Y; Liu Y
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 92(8):1092-6. PubMed ID: 18567650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.
    Vasavada V; Vasavada V; Raj SM; Vasavada AR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17531697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
    Berdahl JP; Jun B; DeStafeno JJ; Kim T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2091-5. PubMed ID: 19027565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parameters.
    Rekas M; Montés-Micó R; Krix-Jachym K; Kluś A; Stankiewicz A; Ferrer-Blasco T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1719-24. PubMed ID: 19781466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of aqualase and phacoemulsification on the corneal endothelium.
    Hu V; Hughes EH; Patel N; Whitefield LA
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 20098310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
    Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD
    Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical application of a Scheimpflug system for lens density measurements in phacoemulsification.
    Kim JS; Chung SH; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1204-9. PubMed ID: 19545809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.