121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19878836)
1. Adhesive retention of sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in an acrylic tube model and in porcine-eye corneal endothelium with different irrigation rates.
Tanaka T; Kimura K; Usui M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):2008-13. PubMed ID: 19878836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro behavior of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification.
Bissen-Miyajima H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):1026-31. PubMed ID: 16814065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alteration of free radical development by ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in phacoemulsification.
Takahashi H; Suzuki H; Shiwa T; Sakamoto A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1545-8. PubMed ID: 16931270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal endothelial cell coating during phacoemulsification using a new dispersive hyaluronic acid ophthalmic viscosurgical device.
Kretz FT; Limberger IJ; Auffarth GU
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1879-84. PubMed ID: 25217075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of ophthalmic viscosurgical device retention using in vivo confocal microscopy.
Petroll WM; Jafari M; Lane SS; Jester JV; Cavanagh HD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2363-8. PubMed ID: 16473232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of incisional friction and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on the heat generation of ultrasound during cataract surgery.
Floyd M; Valentine J; Coombs J; Olson RJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1222-6. PubMed ID: 16857513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of thermoreversible hydrogel (poloxamer 407) to protect the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification in porcine and rabbit eyes.
Choi JY; Cho CS; Han YK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1254-1260. PubMed ID: 30139637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hyaluronic acid combined with mannitol to improve protection against free-radical endothelial damage: experimental model.
Belda JI; Artola A; García-Manzanares MD; Ferrer C; Haroun HE; Hassanein A; Baeyens V; Munoz G; Alió JL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1213-8. PubMed ID: 16039500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes.
Oshika T; Okamoto F; Kaji Y; Hiraoka T; Kiuchi T; Sato M; Kawana K
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 16547332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal times and techniques of a viscoadaptive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.
Auffarth GU; Holzer MP; Vissesook N; Apple DJ; Völcker HE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):879-83. PubMed ID: 15093655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a new cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device on corneal protection and intraocular pressure in small-incision cataract surgery.
Neumayer T; Prinz A; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1362-6. PubMed ID: 18655988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelial cells during phacoemulsification: rabbit model.
Ben-Eliahu S; Tal K; Milstein A; Levin-Harrus T; Ezov N; Kleinmann G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1972-5. PubMed ID: 21029907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of Healon5 and Healon in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation; Randomized multicenter study.
Oshika T; Eguchi S; Oki K; Yaguchi S; Bissen-Miyajima H; Ota I; Sugita G; Miyata K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 15030824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of endothelial cell decrease with VisThesia in phacoemulsification surgery.
Poyales-Galan F; Pirazzoli G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Nov; 31(11):2157-61. PubMed ID: 16412932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Preventing Temperature Rise at the Corneal Endothelium during Phacoemulsification.
Suzuki H; Igarashi T; Shiwa T; Takahashi H
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Dec; 41(12):1548-1552. PubMed ID: 27216478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelium during severe phacoemulsification model in rabbits.
Ben-Eliahu S; Tal K; Milstein A; Levin-Harrus T; Ezov N; Kleinmann G
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 21323271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative thermographic analysis of viscoelastic substances in an experimental study in rabbits.
Jurowski P; Goś R; Kuśmierczyk J; Owczarek G; Gralewicz G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):137-40. PubMed ID: 16516792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of corneal endothelium from irrigation damage: a comparison of sodium hyaluronate and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.
Dua HS; Benedetto DA; Azuara-Blanco A
Eye (Lond); 2000 Feb; 14 ( Pt 1)():88-92. PubMed ID: 10755108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thickness of the Protective Layers of Different Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices During Lens Surgery in a Porcine Model.
Wüst M; Matten P; Nenning M; Findl O
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 11(2):28. PubMed ID: 35175318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of silicone oil droplets from ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in the drainage angle of 2 eyes.
Lam PT; Cheng AC; Rao S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1994-6. PubMed ID: 17964414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
