These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. MolDIA: XML based system of molecular diversity analysis towards virtual screening and QSPR. Maldonado AG; Petitjean M; Doucet JP; Panaye A; Fan BT SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 16513549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current trends in antimicrobial agent research: chemo- and bioinformatics approaches. Hammami R; Fliss I Drug Discov Today; 2010 Jul; 15(13-14):540-6. PubMed ID: 20546918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational methodologies for compound database searching that utilize experimental protein-ligand interaction information. Tan L; Batista J; Bajorath J Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 20636330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discovery of novel CDK1 inhibitors by combining pharmacophore modeling, QSAR analysis and in silico screening followed by in vitro bioassay. Al-Sha'er MA; Taha MO Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Sep; 45(9):4316-30. PubMed ID: 20638755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel technologies for virtual screening. Lengauer T; Lemmen C; Rarey M; Zimmermann M Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14761803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Basic overview of chemoinformatics. Engel T J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2267-77. PubMed ID: 17125169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development. Geromichalos GD J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A structural feature-based computational approach for toxicology predictions. Valerio LG; Yang C; Arvidson KB; Kruhlak NL Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 6(4):505-18. PubMed ID: 20074001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Special Issue: Chemoinformatics. Willett P Molecules; 2016 Apr; 21(4):535. PubMed ID: 27110754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applications and limitations of in silico models in drug discovery. Sacan A; Ekins S; Kortagere S Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 910():87-124. PubMed ID: 22821594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discovery of new MurF inhibitors via pharmacophore modeling and QSAR analysis followed by in-silico screening. Taha MO; Atallah N; Al-Bakri AG; Paradis-Bleau C; Zalloum H; Younis KS; Levesque RC Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Feb; 16(3):1218-35. PubMed ID: 17988876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction methods and databases within chemoinformatics: emphasis on drugs and drug candidates. Jónsdóttir SO; Jørgensen FS; Brunak S Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2145-60. PubMed ID: 15713739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collection and preparation of molecular databases for virtual screening. Saxena AK; Prathipati P SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 16920660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discovery of DPP IV inhibitors by pharmacophore modeling and QSAR analysis followed by in silico screening. Al-Masri IM; Mohammad MK; Taha MO ChemMedChem; 2008 Nov; 3(11):1763-79. PubMed ID: 18989859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening. Prathipati P; Saxena AK J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 16426038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small molecule databases and chemical descriptors useful in chemoinformatics: an overview. Gozalbes R; Pineda-Lucena A Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jul; 14(6):548-458. PubMed ID: 21521149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]