75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19878899)
1. Minimizing specimen length in elastic testing of end-constrained cancellous bone.
Lievers WB; Waldman SD; Pilkey AK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jan; 3(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 19878899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Specimen diameter and "side artifacts" in cancellous bone evaluated using end-constrained elastic tension.
Lievers WB; Petryshyn AC; Poljsak AS; Waldman SD; Pilkey AK
Bone; 2010 Aug; 47(2):371-7. PubMed ID: 20380901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of end boundary conditions and specimen geometry on the viscoelastic properties of cancellous bone measured by dynamic mechanical analysis.
Dong XN; Yeni YN; Les CM; Fyhrie DP
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Mar; 68(3):573-83. PubMed ID: 14762938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validation of a compression testing method for cancellous human jawbone by high-resolution finite element modeling.
Stoppie N; Van Cleynenbreugel T; Wevers M; Vander Sloten J; Naert I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 17622011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the applicability of bovine morsellized cortico-cancellous bone as a substitute for human morsellized cortico-cancellous bone for in vitro mechanical testing.
Lunde KB; Foss OA; Skallerud B
J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3469-74. PubMed ID: 18995858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postfailure modulus strongly affects microcracking and mechanical property change in human iliac cancellous bone: a study using a 2D nonlinear finite element method.
Wang X; Zauel RR; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2654-8. PubMed ID: 18672244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mechanical properties of therapeutic sand upon femur and its finite element analysis].
You B; Mahemuti D; Kuerban K
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 89(41):2946-8. PubMed ID: 20137657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental method for the measurement of the elastic modulus of trabecular bone tissue.
Mente PL; Lewis JL
J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 2703939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent Young's modulus of human radius using inverse finite-element method.
Bosisio MR; Talmant M; Skalli W; Laugier P; Mitton D
J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2022-8. PubMed ID: 17097663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of compact sandwich specimen to determine the critical strain energy release rate of bone.
Paruchuru SP; Wang X; Agrawal CM
Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 17611301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.
Morgan EF; Bayraktar HH; Yeh OC; Majumdar S; Burghardt A; Keaveny TM
J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1413-20. PubMed ID: 15275849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of mineral dissolution from bone specimens on the viscoelastic properties of cortical bone.
Sasaki N; Nozoe T; Nishihara R; Fukui A
J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3511-4. PubMed ID: 18996531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specimen size effect in the volumetric shrinkage of cancellous bone measured at two levels of dehydration.
Lievers WB; Lee V; Arsenault SM; Waldman SD; Pilkey AK
J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):1903-9. PubMed ID: 17054965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
