These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19879794)

  • 21. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reinforcement of PMMA bone cement with a continuous wire coil--a 3D finite element study.
    Frigstad JR; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):429-39. PubMed ID: 9138653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Kareh JA; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Jan; 10(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 1727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does increased bone-cement interface strength have negative consequences for bulk cement integrity? A finite element study.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 37(3):454-66. PubMed ID: 19085106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.
    Hung JP; Chen JH; Chiang HL; Wu JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15451160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of variation of prosthesis size on cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Sep; 28(9):1055-60. PubMed ID: 7814433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
    Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
    Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative measurement of the stresses induced during polymerisation of bone cement.
    Roques A; Browne M; Taylor A; New A; Baker D
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4415-24. PubMed ID: 15046932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
    Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro long-term fatigue endurance of the secondary "Cement Injection Stem" hip prosthesis.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Grupp T; Jansson V; Viceconti M
    Artif Organs; 2007 Jun; 31(6):441-51. PubMed ID: 17537056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.