86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19880225)
1. Simple technique to achieve a natural position of the head for cone beam computed tomography.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 48(3):236-8. PubMed ID: 19880225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional reproducibility of natural head position.
Weber DW; Fallis DW; Packer MD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 23631976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified method of recording and reproducing natural head position with a multicamera system and a laser level.
Liu XJ; Li QQ; Pang YJ; Tian KY; Xie Z; Li ZL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 26038082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple technique to achieve a natural head position for cephalography.
Chen CM; Lai S; Tseng YC; Lee KT
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):677-8. PubMed ID: 18757119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural Head Postures of Patients With Facial Asymmetry in Frontal View Are Corrected After Orthognathic Surgeries.
Kim JY; Kang MH; You JY; Jee HG; Yi JW; Kim BH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Directional view interpolation for compensation of sparse angular sampling in cone-beam CT.
Bertram M; Wiegert J; Schafer D; Aach T; Rose G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jul; 28(7):1011-22. PubMed ID: 19131294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography: strengths, weaknesses, and controversies.
Geist JR
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2011 Mar; 93(3):48-62. PubMed ID: 21526729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of natural head position in normal Chinese people.
Tian K; Li Q; Wang X; Liu X; Wang X; Li Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 26321348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural position of the head: review of two-dimensional and three-dimensional methods of recording.
Cassi D; De Biase C; Tonni I; Gandolfini M; Di Blasio A; Piancino MG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 54(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 26896079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a cone angle weighted three-dimensional image reconstruction algorithm to reduce cone-beam artefacts.
Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):398-406. PubMed ID: 17082329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural head position and inclination of craniofacial planes.
Petricevic N; Celebic A; Celic R; Baucic-Bozic M
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 16752626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method to orient 3-dimensional computed tomography models to the natural head position: a clinical feasibility study.
Xia JJ; McGrory JK; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF; Dawson BC; Kennedy KA; Lasky RE; English JD; Kau CH; McGrory KR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):584-91. PubMed ID: 21353923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reproducibility of the head position for a laser scan using a novel morphometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.
Soncul M; Bamber MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 29(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 10833142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.
Damstra J; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):886-94. PubMed ID: 22133955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
