These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19880225)

  • 21. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method.
    Bobek S; Farrell B; Choi C; Farrell B; Weimer K; Tucker M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1143-58. PubMed ID: 25795181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Imagery and orthodontics: trends, present and future].
    Cavézian R; Pasquet G
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Mar; 79(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18364212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics--past present and future.
    Jyothikiran H; Shanthara JR; Subbiah P; Thomas M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 24812737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Upper airway detection and visualization from cone beam image slices.
    Celenk M; Farrell ML; Eren H; Kumar K; Singh GD; Lozanoff S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2010; 18(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 20495240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New way to achieve frontal facial photographs of the head in its natural position.
    Dong Y; Yin AA; Jia J; Bai SZ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):563-5. PubMed ID: 24813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Naitoh M; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 19344041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of two methods used to determine the centre of gravity of a cadaver head in the sagittal plane.
    Preston CB; Evans WG; Rumbak A
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Dec; 51(12):787-93. PubMed ID: 9462039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer.
    Nasef AA; El-Beialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 25172262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
    Swennen GR; Schutyser F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Artifacts interfering with interpretation of cone beam computed tomography images.
    Makins SR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 24993920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Application of a video image subtraction system to measure and control head position in cephalometry.
    Cohen AM; Linney AD; Reece B
    Br J Orthod; 1988 May; 15(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 3293657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of Different Modalities to Record Natural Head Position in 3 Dimensions: A Systematic Review.
    Leung MY; Lo J; Leung YY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2261-2284. PubMed ID: 27235181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semiautomated three-dimensional craniofacial imaging and modeling.
    Levy RA
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 8169089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. REPLY: Does Head and Neck Posture Affect Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Upper Airway?
    Coppelson K; Zaghi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 81(7):804-805. PubMed ID: 37400180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RE: Does Head and Neck Posture Affect Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Upper Airway?
    Singh GD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 81(7):804. PubMed ID: 37400179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A synthetic three-dimensional craniofacial analysis.
    Farronato G; Farronato D; Toma L; Bellincioni F
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Nov; 44(11):673-8; quiz 688. PubMed ID: 21488433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.