These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19882485)

  • 1. Rear-impact neck protection devices for adult wheelchair users.
    Simms CK; Madden B; Fitzpatrick D; Tiernan J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 19882485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC).
    Boström O; Fredriksson R; Håland Y; Jakobsson L; Krafft M; Lövsund P; Muser MH; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 10688488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of wheelchair headrest use on pediatric head and neck injury risk outcomes during rear impact.
    Fuhrman SI; Karg PE; Bertocci GE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1595-603. PubMed ID: 18606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built.
    Zhang X; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26148123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.
    Croft AC; Philippens MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head restraints--the neglected countermeasure.
    O'Neill B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 10688470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
    Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of seat-back and head-restraint properties on the head-neck motion during rear-impact.
    Svensson MY; Lövsund P; Håland Y; Larsson S
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Mar; 28(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 8703280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anthropometric specifications, development, and evaluation of EvaRID--a 50th percentile female rear impact finite element dummy model.
    Carlsson A; Chang F; Lemmen P; Kullgren A; Schmitt KU; Linder A; Svensson MY
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):855-65. PubMed ID: 24484526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact.
    Maher J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 10688486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of active head restraint in preventing whiplash.
    Viano DC; Olsen S
    J Trauma; 2001 Nov; 51(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 11706347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wheelchair integrated occupant restraints: feasibility in frontal impact.
    VanRoosmalen L; Bertocci GE; Ha D; Karg P
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Dec; 23(10):687-98. PubMed ID: 11801410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the whiplash injury criteria.
    Ivancic PC; Sha D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jan; 42(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19887145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of anti-whiplash seats during low/moderate speed rear-end collisions.
    Mang DWH; Siegmund GP; Blouin JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 32027520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.