These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19882494)

  • 1. Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids.
    Gnewikow D; Ricketts T; Bratt GW; Mutchler LC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(5):603-18. PubMed ID: 19882494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):353-64. PubMed ID: 15506497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):365-96. PubMed ID: 15506498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation.
    Hawkins DB; Yacullo WS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 6748623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
    Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes.
    Bentler R; Palmer C; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 16646278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes.
    Palmer C; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 16646279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems.
    Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Nov; 49(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 6503247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of age on directional microphone hearing aid benefit and preference.
    Wu YH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 20166310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Olson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Jun; 13(6):295-307. PubMed ID: 12141387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.