354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19883401)
1. The impact of fewer hip fractures with risedronate versus alendronate in the first year of treatment: modeled German cost-effectiveness analysis.
Thompson M; Pasquale M; Grima D; Moehrke W; Kruse HP
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19883401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Greater first year effectiveness drives favorable cost-effectiveness of brand risedronate versus generic or brand alendronate: modeled Canadian analysis.
Grima DT; Papaioannou A; Thompson MF; Pasquale MK; Adachi JD
Osteoporos Int; 2008 May; 19(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 18008100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of osteoporosis treatment with risedronate.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Felsenberg D; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2003; 23(4):93-105. PubMed ID: 15224498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for women with osteoporosis in Canada.
Goeree R; Blackhouse G; Adachi J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Jul; 22(7):1425-36. PubMed ID: 16834841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risedronate versus alendronate in older patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.
Berto P; Maggi S; Noale M; Lopatriello S
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2010 Apr; 22(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 20145427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of gastro-resistant risedronate tablets for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 30701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women.
Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Nyman JA; Melton LJ; Kane RL
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Oct; 53(10):1697-704. PubMed ID: 16181168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of risedronate for osteoporosis treatment and fracture prevention in women: a Swiss perspective.
Wasserfallen JB; Krieg MA; Greiner RA; Lamy O
J Med Econ; 2008; 11(3):499-523. PubMed ID: 19450101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada.
Chau D; Becker DL; Coombes ME; Ioannidis G; Adachi JD; Goeree R
J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():3-14. PubMed ID: 23035625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence to inform decision makers in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Kingkaew P; Maleewong U; Ngarmukos C; Teerawattananon Y
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S20-8. PubMed ID: 22265062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in US women: cost-effectiveness and budget impact considerations.
Tosteson AN; Burge RT; Marshall DA; Lindsay R
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):605-15. PubMed ID: 18778176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF COST EFFICACY OF DRUGS FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS: A META-ANALYSIS.
Albert SG; Reddy S
Endocr Pract; 2017 Jul; 23(7):841-856. PubMed ID: 28448754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Denosumab: a cost-effective alternative for older men with osteoporosis from a Swedish payer perspective.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Agodoa I; Silverman S; Orwoll E
Bone; 2014 Feb; 59():105-13. PubMed ID: 24231131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in elderly Japanese women at high risk of fragility fractures: comparison of denosumab and weekly alendronate.
Yoshizawa T; Nishino T; Okubo I; Yamazaki M
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Aug; 13(1):94. PubMed ID: 30159632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of primary prevention with alendronate of osteoporotic hip fractures in Catalonia.
Pueyo MJ; Larrosa M; Surís X; Garcia-Ruiz AJ
Reumatol Clin; 2012; 8(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 22421456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries--an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial.
Ström O; Borgström F; Sen SS; Boonen S; Haentjens P; Johnell O; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1047-61. PubMed ID: 17333449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of preventative therapies for postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
Meadows ES; Klein R; Rousculp MD; Smolen L; Ohsfeldt RL; Johnston JA
BMC Womens Health; 2007 Apr; 7():6. PubMed ID: 17439652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
