These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1988468)

  • 1. 3-S prosthesis: a preliminary report.
    Madigan RR; Fillauer KD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1991; 11(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 1988468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees.
    Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prosthetic management of the elderly following amputation of the lower extremities].
    Lucke C; Kleff GA
    Z Gerontol; 1988; 21(6):320-6. PubMed ID: 3239155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees.
    Korkmaz M; Erbahçeci F; Ulger O; Topuz S
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012; 46(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 22951757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation.
    Malone JM; Fleming LL; Roberson J; Whitesides TE; Leal JM; Poole JU; Grodin RS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1984 May; 21(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 6527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of below-knee suspension systems: effect on gait.
    Wirta RW; Golbranson FL; Mason R; Calvo K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 2089149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetics for pediatric and adolescent amputees.
    Muilenburg TB
    Cancer Treat Res; 2009; 152():395-420. PubMed ID: 20213404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 2. The pediatric amputee.
    Jain S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Mar; 77(3 Suppl):S9-13. PubMed ID: 8599549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of clinical test and questionnaires for the evaluation of upper limb prosthetic use in children.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Marincek C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5; 26(14-15):911-6. PubMed ID: 15497921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use.
    Roeschlein RA; Domholdt E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2717379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting prosthetic rehabilitation outcome in lower limb amputee patients with the functional independence measure.
    Leung EC; Rush PJ; Devlin M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Jun; 77(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 8831480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive prosthetics for the lower extremity.
    Carroll K
    Foot Ankle Clin; 2001 Jun; 6(2):371-86. PubMed ID: 11488061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elevated vacuum suspension preserves residual-limb skin health in people with lower-limb amputation: Randomized clinical trial.
    Rink C; Wernke MM; Powell HM; Gynawali S; Schroeder RM; Kim JY; Denune JA; Gordillo GM; Colvin JM; Sen CK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1121-1132. PubMed ID: 28355039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluctuating residual limb volume accommodated with an adjustable, modular socket design: A novel case report.
    Mitton K; Kulkarni J; Dunn KW; Ung AH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 27888261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of temperature-control liner materials on long-term outcomes of lower limb prosthesis use: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
    Fiedler G; Singh A; Zhang X
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31924257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of interface pressures with pin and suction suspension systems.
    Beil TL; Street GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004; 41(6A):821-8. PubMed ID: 15685470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.