299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19884706)
1. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length.
Vahid A; Roohi N; Zayeri F
Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 19703083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
