322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19884716)
1. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2-year study.
Del Pizzo M; Zucchelli G; Modica F; Villa R; Debernardi C
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1181-7. PubMed ID: 16212581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure.
Huang LH; Neiva RE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1729-34. PubMed ID: 16253095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative clinical study of coronally advanced flap with and without use of plasma rich in growth factors in the treatment of gingival recession.
Lafzi A; Chitsazi MT; Farahani RM; Faramarzi M
Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 21874932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acellular dermal matrix for mucogingival surgery: a meta-analysis.
Gapski R; Parks CA; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1814-22. PubMed ID: 16274299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of root coverage using acellular dermal matrix with and without enamel matrix derivative.
Shin SH; Cueva MA; Kerns DG; Hallmon WW; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Nunn ME
J Periodontol; 2007 Mar; 78(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 17335405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and histological evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix allograft in combination with the coronally advanced flap in the treatment of Miller class I recession defects: an experimental study in the mini-pig.
Núñez J; Caffesse R; Vignoletti F; Guerra F; San Roman F; Sanz M
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19508251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating human gingival recession defects with acellular dermis matrix and enamel matrix derivative using coronally advanced flaps.
Wallace SC
Gen Dent; 2014; 62(2):e12-5. PubMed ID: 24598503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
