These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19884865)

  • 1. Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit.
    Kretzschmar F; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1613-8. PubMed ID: 19884865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To predict or not to predict: influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations.
    Roehm D; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Rösler F; Schlesewsky M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 19(8):1259-74. PubMed ID: 17651001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words.
    Titone DA; Salisbury DF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):470-8. PubMed ID: 15223192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 16545344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.
    Meng X; Jian J; Shu H; Tian X; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():91-102. PubMed ID: 18539265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components.
    Thornhill DE; Van Petten C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 22226800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parafoveal and foveal N400 effects in natural reading: A timeline of semantic processing from fixation-related potentials.
    Li N; Wang S; Kornrumpf F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2024 May; 61(5):e14524. PubMed ID: 38297818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The N400 in beginning readers.
    Coch D; Holcomb PJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2003 Sep; 43(2):146-66. PubMed ID: 12918093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Frishkoff GA
    Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 16908058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of increased working memory load on semantic neural systems: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.
    D'Arcy RC; Service E; Connolly JF; Hawco CS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 15653292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence context affects the brain response to masked words.
    Coulson S; Brang D
    Brain Lang; 2010 Jun; 113(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 20303578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accessing world knowledge: evidence from N400 and reaction time priming.
    Chwilla DJ; Kolk HH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 16202570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.
    Hyönä J; Häikiö T
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Dec; 46(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 16277648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates the N400 during sentence reading.
    Stites MC; Payne BR; Federmeier KD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):475-490. PubMed ID: 28101830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of Sentence-Level Semantic Information in Parafovea: Evidence from the RSVP-Flanker Paradigm.
    Zhang W; Li N; Wang X; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139016. PubMed ID: 26418230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.