These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885397)

  • 1. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems.
    Szmukler-Moncler S; Bischof M; Nedir R; Ermrich M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):944-50. PubMed ID: 20465551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols.
    Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
    Juodzbalys G; Sapragoniene M; Wennerberg A; Baltrukonis T
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions.
    Karl M; Kelly JR
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1426-32. PubMed ID: 19643468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS; Amer MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
    Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface modification with alumina blasting and H2SO4-HCl etching for bonding two resin-composite veneers to titanium.
    Taira Y; Egoshi T; Kamada K; Sawase T
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Feb; 122(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 24372961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
    Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
    Singh RG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces.
    Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
    Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of surface treatments on adhesion of low-fusing porcelain to titanium as determined by strain energy release rate.
    Elsaka SE; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1213-20. PubMed ID: 21975306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 81.