1927 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885401)
1. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development.
Teughels W; Van Assche N; Sliepen I; Quirynen M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():68-81. PubMed ID: 16968383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics.
Elter C; Heuer W; Demling A; Hannig M; Heidenblut T; Bach FW; Stiesch-Scholz M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 18548931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants.
O'Mahony A; MacNeill SR; Cobb CM
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 11203932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces.
Bürgers R; Gerlach T; Hahnel S; Schwarz F; Handel G; Gosau M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 19912269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.
Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Papaioannou W; Van Eldere J; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 8666447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials--an in vitro study.
Mabboux F; Ponsonnet L; Morrier JJ; Jaffrezic N; Barsotti O
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2004 Dec; 39(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 15555904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.
Covani U; Marconcini S; Crespi R; Barone A
Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 16966904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials.
Busscher HJ; Rinastiti M; Siswomihardjo W; van der Mei HC
J Dent Res; 2010 Jul; 89(7):657-65. PubMed ID: 20448246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of microorganism species succession on three implant surfaces with different roughness: an in vivo study.
de Freitas MM; da Silva CH; Groisman M; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 21448015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilm related to dental implants.
Lee A; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 20881809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salt impregnation of implant materials.
Ewald A; Ihde S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 19272816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.
Cosyn J; Van Aelst L; Collaert B; Persson GR; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 19673920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12608667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology. An in vivo study on implants.
Quirynen M; Van der Mei HC; Bollen CM; Van den Bossche LH; Doornbusch GI; van Steenberghe D; Busscher HJ
J Periodontol; 1994 Feb; 65(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 8158513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
