1927 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885401)
21. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces.
de Avila ED; Avila-Campos MJ; Vergani CE; Spolidório DM; Mollo Fde A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 26597465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments.
Scarano A; Assenza B; Piattelli M; Iezzi G; Leghissa GC; Quaranta A; Tortora P; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 16447899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments.
Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Zirconia dental implants: a literature review.
Özkurt Z; Kazazoğlu E
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Jun; 37(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 20545529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biofilm formation on surface characterized micro-implants for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.
Chin MY; Sandham A; de Vries J; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
Biomaterials; 2007 Apr; 28(11):2032-40. PubMed ID: 17194475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness.
Sul YT; Byon E; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modified implant surface with slower and less initial biofilm formation.
John G; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 23981274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis.
Bollen CM; Papaioanno W; Van Eldere J; Schepers E; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 9151584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man.
Heuer W; Elter C; Demling A; Neumann A; Suerbaum S; Hannig M; Heidenblut T; Bach FW; Stiesch-Scholz M
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 17441878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Primary bacterial colonization of implant surfaces.
Drake DR; Paul J; Keller JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 10212539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of implant curets on titanium implant surfaces.
Cross-Poline GN; Shaklee RL; Stach DJ
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9545920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces.
Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
