686 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885406)
1. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system.
Clelland NL; Gilat A; McGlumphy EA; Brantley WA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 8112794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II.
Gross MD; Nissan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 11357070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces.
Bernardes SR; de Araujo CA; Neto AJ; Simamoto Junior P; das Neves FD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):781-9. PubMed ID: 19865617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.
Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
