464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885410)
1. A methodology to study the effects of prosthesis misfit over time: an in vivo model.
Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 19885410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Force transmission in bar-retained implant-stabilised mandibular over-dentures: an in-vitro study.
el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 12526275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.
Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
Karl M; Holst S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 9857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit.
Spazzin AO; Abreu RT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21658152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of tilted and short distal implants on axial forces and bending moments in implants supporting fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 21209995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An implant-supported, cobalt-chromium milled bar and nonflanged attachment-retained overdenture to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible.
Lowe LG; Shcherbukhin VM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19573689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
