These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1077 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885412)
1. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study. Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients. Hallman M; Nordin T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases. Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 12956482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants. Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations. Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial. Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new porous hydroxyapatite for promotion of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation: clinical and histologic study in humans. Mangano C; Bartolucci EG; Mazzocco C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12608665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Tawil G; Mawla M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report. Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans. Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite vs β-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation: a comparative histomorphometric study. Kurkcu M; Benlidayi ME; Cam B; Sertdemir Y J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():519-26. PubMed ID: 23072285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series. Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus elevation with an alloplastic material and implants: 11 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. Garlini G; Redemagni M; Donini M; Maiorana C J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 20156662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites. Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A; Carinci F Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 17716258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla. Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]