1371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885412)
1. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.
Hallman M; Nordin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 12956482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations.
Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new porous hydroxyapatite for promotion of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation: clinical and histologic study in humans.
Mangano C; Bartolucci EG; Mazzocco C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12608665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
Tawil G; Mawla M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite vs β-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation: a comparative histomorphometric study.
Kurkcu M; Benlidayi ME; Cam B; Sertdemir Y
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():519-26. PubMed ID: 23072285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus elevation with an alloplastic material and implants: 11 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up.
Garlini G; Redemagni M; Donini M; Maiorana C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 20156662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A; Carinci F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 17716258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla.
Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J
J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
