These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885420)
1. Microleakage under lingual retainer composite bonded with an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system. Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 19885420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under bonded lingual retainers. Baysal A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Usumez S Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 18947287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces. Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 18298203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems. Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite. Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 19858075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique. Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding. Ulker M; Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ucar FI Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19487436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites. Uysal T; Baysal A; Usumez S; Ulker M Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 19858076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage between composite/wire and composite/enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers: direct versus indirect application methods. Yagci A; Uysal T; Ertas H; Amasyali M Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 May; 13(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 20477972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique. Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation. Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems. Moosavi H; Moazzami SM; Loh S; Salari S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):009-16. PubMed ID: 20228982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers. Al-Nimri K; Al-Nimri J Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26999891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of microleakage and shear bond strength of ribbon and twisted wire retainers bonded on human mandibular incisors with two different types of adhesives with and without primer: An in-vitro study. Kavousinejad S; Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Saffar Shahroudi A Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100693. PubMed ID: 36243617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of two soft drinks on bond strength, bracket microleakage, and adhesive remnant on intact and sealed enamel. Navarro R; Vicente A; Ortiz AJ; Bravo LA Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 20631082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre-treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond. Siso HS; Kustarci A; Göktolga EG Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 19544822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]