These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19885636)

  • 21. Multi-centre digital radiography reject analysis for different clinical room use types: The establishment of local reject reference levels for public hospital departments.
    Serra D; Neep MJ; Ryan E
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38845126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Challenges associated with the incorporation of digital radiography into a picture archival and communication system.
    Siegel EL; Reiner BI
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10342154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information.
    Prieto C; Vano E; Ten JI; Fernandez JM; Iñiguez AI; Arevalo N; Litcheva A; Crespo E; Floriano A; Martinez D
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Aug; 22(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 18592314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct digital radiograph. Technicians role in obtaining good images.
    Khafaji MA; Hagi SK
    Saudi Med J; 2014 Aug; 35(8):879-81. PubMed ID: 25129192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The electronic portal imaging system Siemens Beamview Plus versus the conventional verification films CEA-TVS and DuPont COL-7. A critical appraisal of visual image quality.
    Gagel B; Schramm O; Harms W; Mulhern A; Wenz F; van Kampen M; Wannenmacher M; Eble MJ
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Aug; 178(8):446-52. PubMed ID: 12240551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeat rates in digital chest radiography and strategies for improvement.
    Fintelmann F; Pulli B; Abedi-Tari F; Trombley M; Shore MT; Shepard JA; Rosenthal DI
    J Thorac Imaging; 2012 May; 27(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 22331101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography.
    Hasaneen M; AlHameli N; AlMinhali A; Alshehhi S; Salih S; Alomaim MM
    J Med Life; 2023 May; 16(5):731-735. PubMed ID: 37520472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
    Roohi Shalemaei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed radiography image artifacts revisited.
    Shetty CM; Barthur A; Kambadakone A; Narayanan N; Kv R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):W37-47. PubMed ID: 21178029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs.
    Hoffmann KR; Doi K; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Xu XW; Yao L; Kano A; Carlin M
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 7948174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image Acquisition and Quality in Digital Radiography.
    Alexander S
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27601691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography.
    Little K; Reiser I; Apgar B; Dalal P; Dave J; Fisher R; Hulme K; Jafari ME; Marshall E; Meyer S; Moore Q; Murphy N; Nishino T; Nye K; O'Donnell K; Sabol J; Sanchez A; Sensakovic W; Tarbox L; Uzenoff R; Walz-Flannigan A; Willis C; Zhang J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13938. PubMed ID: 36995917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.
    Weatherburn GC; Davies JG
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):856-63. PubMed ID: 10645191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.