147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1988621)
1. National Research Council Board recommends restructuring of U.S. HLRW disposal program.
Ghosh PR
J Nucl Med; 1991 Jan; 32(1):15N-19N, 26N. PubMed ID: 1988621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Senate nod prompts fresh analysis of nuclear waste dump.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):262. PubMed ID: 12124583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Counterterrorism. U.S. science agencies begin to lend a hand.
Malakoff D; Koenig R
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5543):761-2. PubMed ID: 11679639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Academy warns against slipping ethics.
Anderson C
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):747. PubMed ID: 8303286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Academy under fire over plans for new study of DNA statistics..
Macilwain C
Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):101. PubMed ID: 8114894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioterrorism. NAS censors report on agriculture threats.
Mervis J; Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1973-5. PubMed ID: 12242412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Report of the Institute of Medicine: Academic geriatrics for the year 2000. Committee on Leadership for Academic Geriatric Medicine.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Aug; 35(8):773-91. PubMed ID: 3611568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Science and government. Improving science and technology advice for Congress.
Morgan MG; Houghton A; Gibbons JH
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 11557862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Academy and presidential panel issue AIDS reports.
Ezzell C
Nature; 1988 Jun; 333(6173):485. PubMed ID: 3374590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Security worries stifle report on agricultural bioterror.
Gewin V
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):99. PubMed ID: 12226623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Year 2000 issues.
Busby B
Health Phys; 1998 Dec; 75(6):570-1. PubMed ID: 9827502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-activity radioactive materials management at the U.S. Department of Energy.
Marcinowski F; Tonkay DW
Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 17033462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Science policy. Report faults U.S. strategy for nanotoxicology research.
Service RF
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1779. PubMed ID: 19095914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental monitoring and disposal of radioactive wastes from U.S. Naval nuclear-powered ships and their support facilities, 1971.
Miles ME; Sjoblom GL; Burke RD
Radiat Data Rep; 1972 Sep; 13(9):469-78. PubMed ID: 5082345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Report recommends ground testing for space research.
Novak K
Nat Med; 1998 Nov; 4(11):1215. PubMed ID: 9809525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommended stardard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Report of working group 39. Committee on vision. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Adv Ophthalmol; 1980; 41():103-48. PubMed ID: 7001873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral health research personnel. National Research Council.
J Dent Educ; 1994 Sep; 58(9):714-20. PubMed ID: 7962926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National Academy of Sciences endorses National Institutes of Health plan for enhanced access to research information.
Cozzarelli NR; Fulton KR; Sullenberger DM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Oct; 101(42):14991. PubMed ID: 15479758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institute of Medicine study supports state regulation of medical isotopes over NRC.
Silver S
J Nucl Med; 1996 Feb; 37(2):23N. PubMed ID: 8667050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
