These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19887332)

  • 21. Micromechanical properties of human trabecular bone: a hierarchical investigation using nanoindentation.
    Norman J; Shapter JG; Short K; Smith LJ; Fazzalari NL
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Oct; 87(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 18085652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dielectrophoresis tweezers for single cell manipulation.
    Hunt TP; Westervelt RM
    Biomed Microdevices; 2006 Sep; 8(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 16718407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Graphical template software for accurate micromanipulation in a scanning electron microscope.
    Kasaya T; Miyazaki HT
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Jan; 80(1):016104. PubMed ID: 19191465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of flat punch indentation to determine the viscoelastic properties in the time and frequency domains of a soft layer bonded to a rigid substrate.
    Cao Y; Ma D; Raabe D
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Jan; 5(1):240-8. PubMed ID: 18722168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationships of viscosity with contact hardness and modulus of bone matrix measured by nanoindentation.
    Kim DG; Huja SS; Lee HR; Tee BC; Hueni S
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):024502. PubMed ID: 20370248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Macrocompression and nanoindentation of soft viscoelastic biological materials.
    Nayar VT; Weiland JD; Hodge AM
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2012 Dec; 18(12):968-75. PubMed ID: 22656195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nanomechanical probing of microbubbles using the atomic force microscope.
    Sboros V; Glynos E; Pye SD; Moran CM; Butler M; Ross JA; McDicken WN; Koutsos V
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Nov; 46(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 17720211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Viscoelastic response of poly(dimethylsiloxane) in the adhesive interaction with AFM tips.
    Sun Y; Walker GC
    Langmuir; 2005 Sep; 21(19):8694-702. PubMed ID: 16142950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of the Poisson's ratio of the cell: recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration.
    Trickey WR; Baaijens FP; Laursen TA; Alexopoulos LG; Guilak F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 16271590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Viscoelastic properties of the human medial collateral ligament under longitudinal, transverse and shear loading.
    Bonifasi-Lista C; Lake SP; Small MS; Weiss JA
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 15607877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of the elastic/plastic transition of human enamel by nanoindentation.
    Ang SF; Scholz T; Klocke A; Schneider GA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1403-10. PubMed ID: 19647864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of the viscous properties of skin and subcutaneous tissue in uniaxial stress relaxation tests.
    Wu JZ; Cutlip RG; Welcome D; Dong RG
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 16410644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical assessment by magnetocytometry of the cytosolic and cortical cytoskeletal compartments in adherent epithelial cells.
    Laurent VM; Planus E; Fodil R; Isabey D
    Biorheology; 2003; 40(1-3):235-40. PubMed ID: 12454410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanical characterization of pharmaceutical solids: a comparison between rheological tests performed under static and dynamic porosity conditions.
    Bonacucina G; Cespi M; Misici-Falzi M; Palmieri GF
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2007 Aug; 67(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 17276665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nanoindentation creep behavior of human enamel.
    He LH; Swain MV
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Nov; 91(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 18980191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Estimations of mechanical properties of bones using nanoindentation].
    Sakamoto M
    Clin Calcium; 2016 Jan; 26(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 26728534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a micromanipulator-based loading device for mechanoregulation study of human mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional collagen constructs.
    Au-Yeung KL; Sze KY; Sham MH; Chan BP
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2010 Feb; 16(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 19368498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction between the interstitial fluid and the extracellular matrix in confined indentation.
    Lu Y; Wang W
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041011. PubMed ID: 18601453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nanomechanics of biocompatible TiO(2) nanotubes by Interfacial Force Microscopy (IFM).
    Crawford GA; Chawla N; Houston JE
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Dec; 2(6):580-7. PubMed ID: 19716101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An improved method for the measurement of mechanical properties of bone by nanoindentation.
    Tang B; Ngan AH; Lu WW
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Sep; 18(9):1875-81. PubMed ID: 17522963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.