BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1988877)

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of glucose reflectance meters in pregnant insulin-dependent diabetics.
    Harkness LJ; Ashwood ER; Parsons S; Lenke RR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Feb; 77(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 1988877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Perspective on the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters During Pregnancy.
    Immanuel J; Simmons D
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Oct; 41(10):2053-2058. PubMed ID: 30237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of home glucose meters for the glucose range anticipated in pregnancy.
    Moses R; Schier G; Matthews J; Davis W
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Aug; 37(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9325505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [ExacTech--a new measuring system for personal control of blood glucose].
    Regal H; Zdolsek I; Bali C; Irsigler K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Jul; 139(14):337-9. PubMed ID: 2773491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capillary blood glucose screening for gestational diabetes: a preliminary investigation.
    Landon MB; Cembrowski GS; Gabbe SG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 155(4):717-21. PubMed ID: 3766624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three new glucose reflectance meters: Diascan, Glucometer II, and Reflolux II.
    Thai AC; Ng WY; Lui KF; Yeo PP
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1989 Jun; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2752892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of portable blood glucose monitoring. Effect of glucose level and prandial state.
    Vallera DA; Bissell MG; Barron W
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Feb; 95(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 1992617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal timing for postprandial glucose measurement in pregnant women with diabetes and a non-diabetic pregnant population evaluated by the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS).
    Bühling KJ; Winkel T; Wolf C; Kurzidim B; Mahmoudi M; Wohlfarth K; Wäscher C; Schink T; Dudenhausen JW
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 15843262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preprandial versus postprandial blood glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Manderson JG; Patterson CC; Hadden DR; Traub AI; Ennis C; McCance DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Aug; 189(2):507-12. PubMed ID: 14520226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, User Acceptability, and Safety Evaluation for the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System When Used by Pregnant Women with Diabetes.
    Scott EM; Bilous RW; Kautzky-Willer A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 29470094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of user accuracy, techniques, and learning time of various systems for self blood glucose monitoring.
    Tomky DM; Clarke DH
    Diabetes Educ; 1990; 16(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 2076630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ExacTech blood glucose testing system.
    Kyvik KO; Traulsen J; Reinholdt B; Frøland A
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1990; 10(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 2249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of blood glucose meters in pregnant subjects with diabetes.
    Stenger P; Allen ME; Lisius L
    Diabetes Care; 1996 Mar; 19(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 8742575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of glucose monitoring systems modified for the visually impaired.
    Bernbaum M; Albert SG; Brusca S; McGinnis J; Miller D; Hoffmann JW; Mooradian AD
    Diabetes Care; 1993 Oct; 16(10):1363-6. PubMed ID: 8269794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches.
    Brunner GA; Ellmerer M; Sendlhofer G; Wutte A; Trajanoski Z; Schaupp L; Quehenberger F; Wach P; Krejs GJ; Pieber TR
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Apr; 21(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 9571347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuous Glucose Monitor Use With Remote Monitoring Reduces Fear of Hypoglycemia in Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.
    Polsky S; Garcetti R; Pyle L; Joshee P; Demmitt JK; Snell-Bergeon JK
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):191-192. PubMed ID: 31779476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The diabetic patient is often busy or difficult to regulate. Blood glucose control with SMS].
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2003 Sep; 145(38):64. PubMed ID: 14603693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in pregnant woman affected by type 1 diabetes.
    Gatti M
    Acta Diabetol; 2019 Apr; 56(4):481-483. PubMed ID: 30415324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy.
    Buhling KJ; Henrich W; Kjos SL; Siebert G; Starr E; Dreweck C; Stein U; Dudenhausen JW
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 36(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 12849863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia.
    Trajanoski Z; Brunner GA; Gfrerer RJ; Wach P; Pieber TR
    Diabetes Care; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1412-5. PubMed ID: 8941473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.