BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19888854)

  • 1. Guidelines for guidelines: content, accountability, peer review, and intellectual ownership.
    Emerson CH
    Thyroid; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 19888854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New authors' guidelines for Palliative Medicine: more work for authors, reviewers and editors or an essential tool?
    Walshe C
    Palliat Med; 2010 Sep; 24(6):559-60. PubMed ID: 20837732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewing the reviewers: appraisal of the United States Veterans Health Administration report on femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
    Wu AM; Wu CM; Margo CE; Greenberg PB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 41(1):237-9. PubMed ID: 25532649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emphasis on the need for guidelines for documentation of search strategy and results was needed, criticism of a Cochrane review was not.
    Santesso N
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Oct; 92(4):393-4; author reply 394. PubMed ID: 15494751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critics pan EPA plan for weighing toxic chemical risks.
    Zainzinger V
    Science; 2018 Aug; 361(6403):631-632. PubMed ID: 30115787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standards and copyright: finding a balance.
    Larrick K
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2007; 41(4):316-7. PubMed ID: 17849762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tackling Peer Review: How to Improve Reviews and Minimize Abuse.
    Lau DC
    Can J Diabetes; 2016 Apr; 40(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 26952003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heighten individual accountability through peer review.
    Moorer-Whitehead K
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Apr; 41(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 20375673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking.
    McKay JS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty J; Manabe S; Schorsch F; Teranishi M; Weber K
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):508-10. PubMed ID: 20237370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US agencies urged to tighten up peer review.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1993 Aug; 364(6437):470. PubMed ID: 8336780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Review.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2017 Mar; 26(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 30304600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Dobson-Rawlins pact and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: impact of political independence on scientific and legal accountability.
    McPherson S; Sunkin M
    Br J Psychiatry; 2020 Apr; 216(4):231-234. PubMed ID: 31138337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHA members getting ownership guidelines.
    Japsen B
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jul; 27(30):6. PubMed ID: 10168836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Professionalism, accountability and peer review.
    Luke RD; Modrow RE
    Health Serv Res; 1982; 17(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 6954151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ups and downs of peer review.
    Benos DJ; Bashari E; Chaves JM; Gaggar A; Kapoor N; LaFrance M; Mans R; Mayhew D; McGowan S; Polter A; Qadri Y; Sarfare S; Schultz K; Splittgerber R; Stephenson J; Tower C; Walton RG; Zotov A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17562902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review for social accountability of health sciences education: a model from South Africa.
    Michaels DC; Reid SJ; Naidu CS
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2014; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 25420972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.
    Duchesne S; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.