These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19888854)

  • 41. Public or private? Achieving public accountability in HSAs.
    Hagedorn HJ; Schauffler HH; Walcott A; Werlin SH
    Am J Health Plann; 1977 Oct; 2(2):12-20. PubMed ID: 10305954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cultivating ethics consultation: commentary on "The development of a clinical ethics consultation service in a community hospital.
    Anzia DJ; La Puma J
    J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 11643064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?].
    Ziegler A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of peer review on professionalism, autonomy, and accountability.
    Roper KA; Russell G
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1997; 13(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 9287627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Publishing operational research from 'real life' programme data: a better form of accountability.
    Rujumba J; Byamugisha R
    Trop Med Int Health; 2012 Jan; 17(1):133-4. PubMed ID: 21951461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peer-Review Responsibility.
    Cowell JM
    J Sch Nurs; 2015 Dec; 31(6):395. PubMed ID: 26561573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Legal and ethical accountability in everyday practice.
    Atthowe JM
    Behav Eng; 1975; 3(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 11664871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quality of care stressed in peer review guidelines.
    Rodkey GV
    QA Rev; 1990 Mar; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 10113737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Should there be statistical guidelines for medical research papers?
    Biometrics; 1978 Dec; 34(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 749952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The psychiatrist and health insurance claims review.
    Fowler DR
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1978 Jun; 39(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 659375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating the Information Governance Principles for Healthcare: Accountability and Transparency.
    Datskovsky G; Hedges R; Empel S
    J AHIMA; 2015 Feb; 86(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 26901976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Is it need? Or is it purely greed? The AMA hits doctors on self-referrals.
    Beck M; Hager M; Katel P; Hannah D
    Newsweek; 1992 Dec; 120(25):58. PubMed ID: 10123366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership.
    Horner J; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):S330-45. PubMed ID: 21081679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A how-to for peer review.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7345):17. PubMed ID: 21544122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer review guidelines: a survey of local standards of treatment.
    Langsley DG; Lebaron GI
    Am J Psychiatry; 1974 Dec; 131(12):1358-62. PubMed ID: 4432934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility.
    Palamar M; Le DT; Friedman O
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 22591710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel.
    Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using your Web site as an accountability tool.
    Peregrine MW; Schwartz JR
    Trustee; 2004 May; 57(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 15181772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.