158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19890643)
1. Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis--analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures.
Schaefer FK; Waldmann A; Katalinic A; Wefelnberg C; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur Radiol; 2010 May; 20(5):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19890643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.
Nothacker M; Duda V; Hahn M; Warm M; Degenhardt F; Madjar H; Weinbrenner S; Albert US
BMC Cancer; 2009 Sep; 9():335. PubMed ID: 19765317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?
Weigel S; Biesheuvel C; Berkemeyer S; Kugel H; Heindel W
Eur Radiol; 2013 Mar; 23(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 23052645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits of the quality assured double and arbitration reading of mammograms in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women.
Waldmann A; Kapsimalakou S; Katalinic A; Grande-Nagel I; Stoeckelhuber BM; Fischer D; Barkhausen J; Vogt FM
Eur Radiol; 2012 May; 22(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 22095439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study.
Weinstein SP; Localio AR; Conant EF; Rosen M; Thomas KM; Schnall MD
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(36):6124-8. PubMed ID: 19884532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.
Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Dünser M
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Aug; 21(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 11014255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice].
Madjar H; Becker S; Doubek K; Horchler T; Mendoza M; Moisidis-Tesch C; Näther B; Niebling K; Pröls U; Schardt AR; Ulrich S; Zahn U
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 20408119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection.
Kaiser JS; Helvie MA; Blacklaw RL; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 12034957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 9530316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.
Hwang JY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam MY
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 26256979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Lehrer D; Böhm-Vélez M; Pisano ED; Jong RA; Evans WP; Morton MJ; Mahoney MC; Larsen LH; Barr RG; Farria DM; Marques HS; Boparai K;
JAMA; 2008 May; 299(18):2151-63. PubMed ID: 18477782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
