665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19891193)
1. Changes in content, format, and posting of the accreditation survey findings report.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Oct; 29(10):12-3. PubMed ID: 19891193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. APPROVED: an extension for extension surveys.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):8. PubMed ID: 19845208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
Ente BH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revisions to the Public Information Policy.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):7, 9. PubMed ID: 16515349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Standards, policy, and survey eligibility changes for 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(6):7. PubMed ID: 11142238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fine tuning the tailored survey policy.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 May; 21(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11383203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accreditation nomenclature revised, survey report clarified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(3-4):6. PubMed ID: 10313768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to stay prepared for a random unannounced survey.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11147546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. GAO report affirms integrity of Joint Commission accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Feb; 27(2):3. PubMed ID: 17370750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint Commission to offer accreditation services in other countries.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(4):5. PubMed ID: 10164931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating survey results.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 15085693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Should you consider ISO 9000?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10175807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. APPROVED: Decision rule for a preliminary denial of accreditation eliminated.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):4. PubMed ID: 20698087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Approved: elimination of one-year follow-up survey for certain organizations new to the accreditation/certification process.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):10. PubMed ID: 19186445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The launch of Shared Visions-New Pathways.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14746090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. APPROVED: New preliminary denial of accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):7. PubMed ID: 20698090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Going global. JCAHO to accredit foreign healthcare organizations.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(14):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10178298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revised Sentinel Event Policy features Accreditation Watch provision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 10169090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
