BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19891287)

  • 21. Understanding diagnostic tests. Part 3.
    Ferreira JC; Patino CM
    J Bras Pneumol; 2018; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 29538535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing diagnostic and screening tests: Part 2. How to use the research literature on diagnosis.
    Gilbert R; Logan S; Moyer VA; Elliott EJ
    West J Med; 2001 Jul; 175(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11431401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point.
    Bantis LE; Nakas CT; Reiser B
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):212-23. PubMed ID: 24261514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Reiser B; Nakas CT
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):635-6. PubMed ID: 26776063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research Methods: Diagnostic Test Characteristics.
    Mediratta RP; Newman TB; Wang ME
    Hosp Pediatr; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 37144292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The (in)validity of sensitivity and specificity.
    Guggenmoos-Holzmann I; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(13):1783-92. PubMed ID: 10861778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing a test.
    Koziol-McLain J; Lowenstein SR
    J Emerg Nurs; 1997 Apr; 23(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 9216296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response to comment on 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 26776064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing Diagnostic Tests II: Grading on a Curve.
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(4):765-6. PubMed ID: 25977153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
    Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests.
    Vickers AJ; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
    BMJ; 2016 Jan; 352():i6. PubMed ID: 26810254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
    Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Weinstein S; Obuchowski NA; Lieber ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15615943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the discriminatory and predictive accuracy of the RDT against the microscopy in the diagnosis of malaria among under-five children in Nigeria.
    Fagbamigbe AF
    Malar J; 2019 Feb; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 30791912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.