These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19891287)

  • 41. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
    Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bayes' theorem, the ROC diagram and reference values: Definition and use in clinical diagnosis.
    Kallner A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Feb; 28(1):010101. PubMed ID: 29209139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The diagnostic "gold standard" in oncology: increasing importance and increasing concerns.
    Markman M
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2006 Jul; 8(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17269188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fuzzy receiver operating characteristic curve: an option to evaluate diagnostic tests.
    Castanho MJ; Barros LC; Yamakami A; Vendite LL
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 May; 11(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 17521074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test.
    Cai T; Moskowitz CS
    Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 15475420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
    Hand DJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reference values: no need for confusion.
    Obuchowski NA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 137(6):1572-3. PubMed ID: 19464491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Positive sweat test following meningococcal septicaemia.
    Eisenhut M; Southern KW
    Acta Paediatr; 2002; 91(3):361-2. PubMed ID: 12022315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Eccentric diagnostic tests: redefining sensitivity and specificity.
    Somoza E
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 8717594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test data: a bivariate Bayesian modeling approach.
    Verde PE
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3088-102. PubMed ID: 21170904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evidence-based emergency medicine/skills for evidence-based emergency care. Interval likelihood ratios: another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician.
    Brown MD; Reeves MJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Aug; 42(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 12883521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
    Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The validity of the postcoital test.
    Griffith CS; Grimes DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 162(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 2180299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. ROC analysis as an additional method to characterize time to event data.
    Koch HJ; Hau P
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2005; 11(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15800683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of plasma copper levels in cattle.
    Minatel L; Carfagnini JC
    Prev Vet Med; 2002 Feb; 53(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11821132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.