These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19891618)

  • 21. Can women's autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal?
    Mullany BC; Hindin MJ; Becker S
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 15922498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors influencing women's decisions regarding pertussis vaccine: A decision-making study in the Postpartum Pertussis Immunization Program of a teaching hospital in Taiwan.
    Cheng PJ; Huang SY; Shaw SW; Kao CC; Chueh HY; Chang SD; Hsu TY; Kung FT; Hsieh TT
    Vaccine; 2010 Aug; 28(34):5641-7. PubMed ID: 20600516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?
    Hoskovec J; Mastrobattista JM; Johnston D; Kerrigan A; Robbins-Furman P; Wicklund CA
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18236427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pregnancy and technology: Thai women's perceptions and experience of prenatal testing.
    Rice PL; Naksook C
    Health Care Women Int; 1999; 20(3):259-78. PubMed ID: 10633624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests.
    Davey HM; Lim J; Butow PN; Barratt AL; Redman S
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(9):1699-707. PubMed ID: 14990371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions.
    Etchegary H; Potter B; Howley H; Cappelli M; Coyle D; Graham I; Walker M; Wilson B
    Genet Test; 2008 Mar; 12(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 18307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Congenital anomalies: parents' anxiety and women's concerns before prenatal testing and women's opinions towards the risk factors.
    Sahin NH; Gungor I
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 18279286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18186151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for thalassaemia in pregnant Pakistani women in the North of England.
    Ahmed S; Green JM; Hewison J
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Mar; 26(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 16475227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?
    Santalahti P; Aro AR; Hemminki E; Helenius H; Ryynänen M
    Prenat Diagn; 1998 Feb; 18(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 9516017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Can we improve the content and quality of information delivered prior to amniocentesis?].
    Malkiel A; Granat M; Sagi M; Brezis M
    Harefuah; 2008 Jan; 147(1):16-20, 96, 95. PubMed ID: 18300617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.
    Shorten A; Shorten B; Keogh J; West S; Morris J
    Birth; 2005 Dec; 32(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 16336366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.
    Gourounti K; Sandall J
    Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17316936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are counsellors' attitudes influencing pregnant women's attitudes and decisions on prenatal screening?
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Kleinveld JH; van Eijk JT; Knol DL; van der Wal G; van Vugt JM
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 17367105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Women's knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping.
    Cederholm M; Axelsson O; Sjödén PO
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 10586479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An evaluation of the decision-making process regarding amniocentesis following a screen-positive maternal serum screen result.
    Kobelka C; Mattman A; Langlois S
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 May; 29(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 19242922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring Indian women's reproductive decision-making regarding prenatal testing.
    Gupta JA
    Cult Health Sex; 2010 Feb; 12(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 20054723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].
    Nagle C; Gunn J; Bell R; Lewis S; Meiser B; Metcalfe S; Ukoumunne OC; Halliday J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 18190370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.