894 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19892076)
1. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
Dijkers MP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reporting guidelines are also useful for readers of medical research publications: CONSORT, STARD, STROBE and others].
Meerpohl JJ; Blümle A; Antes G; Elm Ev
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2078-83. PubMed ID: 19802771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The content of medical journal Instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Arora S; Altman DG
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Dec; 48(6):743-9, 749.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17112938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
Parent N; Hanley JA
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Registration of clinical trials: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors].
DeAngelis C; Drazen JM; Frizelle FA; Haug C; Hoey J; Horton R; Kotzin S; Laine C; Marusic A; Overbeke AJ; Schroeder TV; Sox HC; van der Weyden MB;
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Sep; 148(38):1870-1. PubMed ID: 15497781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 1.
Mansfield L
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Aug; 95(2):100-7; qiuz 107-8. PubMed ID: 16136758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article.
Siwek J; Gourlay ML; Slawson DC; Shaughnessy AF
Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 11820489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.
Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Brezden-Masley C; Dent R; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1993-9. PubMed ID: 15143092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caveats in the proficient preparation of an APA-style research manuscript for publication.
Cash TF
Body Image; 2009 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19059816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
von Elm E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specification of laboratory animal use in scientific articles: current low detail in the journals' instructions for authors and some proposals.
Alfaro V
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 27(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 16258595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What makes a high quality clinical research paper?
Groves T
Oral Dis; 2010 May; 16(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 20233312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized clinical trials behind level A recommendations in obstetric practice bulletins: compliance with CONSORT statement.
Chauhan SP; Berghella V; Sanderson M; Siddiqui D; Hendrix NW; Magann EF
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 18979412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
