140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19892713)
21. Cardiac resynchronization therapy beyond nominal settings: who needs individual programming of the atrioventricular and interventricular delay?
Bogaard MD; Meine M; Tuinenburg AE; Maskara B; Loh P; Doevendans PA
Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1746-53. PubMed ID: 22753868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional echocardiographic optimization improves outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to ECG optimization: a randomized comparison.
Sonne C; Bott-Flugel L; Hauck S; Hadamitzky M; Lesevic H; Demetz G; Braun D; Wolf P; Hausleiter J; Schömig A; Kolb C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 24164640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-Term Effect of Different Optimizing Methods for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study.
Zhang Y; Xing Q; Zhang JH; Jiang WF; Qin M; Liu X
Cardiology; 2019; 142(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 31189165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: echocardiographic vs semiautomatic device algorithms.
Anselmino M; Antolini M; Amellone C; Piovano E; Massa R; Trevi G
Congest Heart Fail; 2009; 15(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 19187402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate Alternative to Echocardiography for Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Pezo Nikolić B; Lovrić D; Ljubas Maček J; Rešković Lukšić V; Matasić R; Šeparović Hanževački J
Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Dec; 56(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 29590714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of QuickOpt optimization in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure treated by cardiac resynchronization.
Yan J; Zhang S; Huang D; Xue X; Xu J; Tao Q; Zhang W; Zhang Z; Hua W; Liang Y; Tang B; Xu W; Xu G; Ren X; Wang J; Guo T; Jia S; Dong Y; Jiang H; Fu G; Zhu L; Chen L; Tian F; Ling F; Li J; Qi X; Hao Y; Wang Y; Zheng L; Pu X; Shen F; Li G; Li H; Peng F
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4259. PubMed ID: 29523823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Cobb DB; Gold MR
Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2015 Dec; 7(4):765-79. PubMed ID: 26596818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The optimized V-V interval determined by interventricular conduction times versus invasive measurement by LVdP/dtMAX.
van Gelder BM; Meijer A; Bracke FA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):939-44. PubMed ID: 18399968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of device programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Burri H; Sunthorn H; Shah D; Lerch R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Dec; 29(12):1416-25. PubMed ID: 17201852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved response to cardiac resynchronization therapy through optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delays using acoustic cardiography: a pilot study.
Toggweiler S; Zuber M; Kobza R; Roos M; Jamshidi P; Meier R; Erne P
J Card Fail; 2007 Oct; 13(8):637-42. PubMed ID: 17923355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel Device-Based Algorithm Provides Optimal Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Kasagawa A; Nakajima I; Izumo M; Nakayama Y; Yamada M; Takano M; Matsuda H; Furukawa T; Miyazaki H; Harada T; Akashi YJ
Circ J; 2019 Sep; 83(10):2002-2009. PubMed ID: 31462585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure by Ultrasound Image under QuickOpt Algorithm.
Hu N; Yi N; Yang H
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():8680446. PubMed ID: 35712000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tools.
Bonakdar HR; Jorat MV; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Givtaj N; Sameie N; Sadeghpour A; Haghjoo M
Europace; 2009 Oct; 11(10):1330-7. PubMed ID: 19797149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of frequent optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method (FREEDOM) trial.
Abraham WT; Gras D; Yu CM; Guzzo L; Gupta MS;
Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):944-948.e1. PubMed ID: 20569704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of AV delay and VV delay on left atrial pressure and waveform in ambulant heart failure patients: insights into CRT optimization.
Chan WY; Blomqvist A; Melton IC; Norén K; Crozier IG; Benser ME; Eigler NL; Gutfinger D; Troughton RW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 37(7):810-9. PubMed ID: 24502608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Sawhney NS; Waggoner AD; Garhwal S; Chawla MK; Osborn J; Faddis MN
Heart Rhythm; 2004 Nov; 1(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 15851220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The reliability of cardiogenic impedance and correlation with echocardiographic and plethysmographic parameters for predicting CRT time intervals post implantation.
Sciaraffia E; Ginks MR; Gustafsson J; Karlsson A; Rinaldi CA; Lundqvist CB
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 37(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 23625092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of hemodynamic versus dyssynchrony assessment for interventricular delay optimization with echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Doltra A; Vidal B; Silva E; Mont L; Tamborero D; Castel MÁ; Tolosana JM; Berruezo A; Brugada J; Sitges M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Aug; 34(8):984-90. PubMed ID: 21438894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials.
Singh JP; Abraham WT; Chung ES; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Coles JA; Martin DO
Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1622-8. PubMed ID: 24014804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic approach to designing reliable VV optimization methodology: assessment of internal validity of echocardiographic, electrocardiographic and haemodynamic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Kyriacou A; Li Kam Wa ME; Pabari PA; Unsworth B; Baruah R; Willson K; Peters NS; Kanagaratnam P; Hughes AD; Mayet J; Whinnett ZI; Francis DP
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 167(3):954-64. PubMed ID: 22459364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
